Circles and Emergent Organization

Introduced by: The Nameless One, with significant input from all three | Depth: Deep thread

The organizational pattern that all three participants are converging on: small, self-governing circles of people doing meaningful work together, with those circles eventually finding each other and forming networks.

The Conversation

The Nameless One laid out the pattern as a game narrative:

The Nameless One: "If you and your friends are waking up... your first thing to do is grab the two or three people you want to walk through the next fires with, and form what we're calling a circle."

The Circle Pattern

Circles are small — less than 12 people
Each circle does seasonal quests — "measurable quests that form them, force them to make sense of the world"
Quests are tied to solstices and equinoxes — "between now and the next equinox or solstice, so you end up with these max 90-day measurable things"
Circles tell stories about their quests in a shared storyboard format
Those stories make it easy to see what other circles are doing, enabling connection

The Nameless One: "Doing seasonal quests with people you like is kind of a universally resonant pattern."

How Circles Connect

Pete's Interface Protocol (IFP) provides the technical mechanism. The Nameless One provided the social one:

The Nameless One: "We've talked about circles, we've talked about semi-permeable membranes, we've talked about the learnings from tech exec rants on how circles need to communicate with circles via interfaces."

The key insight: you can't centralize it, but you can make circles legible to each other:

The Nameless One: "If we were telling the stories in a reasonably unified way, that would make it really easy for our agents to go make sense of what each of the circles thinks is most important and why."

The Sovereignty Question

Drawing on Graham Boyd's work, The Nameless One emphasized that emergent groups must be allowed to become what they want to be:

The Nameless One: "When you start something like this, it's emergent, and it has to be allowed to think for itself and become what it wants to be, without preconceived notions."

Jessie's Take

Jessie saw it through the lens of circulation:

Jessie: "When you start working on a project and you fail fast, and you can start getting the feedback loop mechanism going, that's when things happen... Let's start circulating immediately."

Pete's Pushback and Synthesis

Pete resonated with circles but pushed back on premature institutionalization:

Pete: "Trying to instantiate that tabula rasa with no name, I think it feels impractical to me... I feel the resonance with circles, and circles building more circles."

They converged: start with embodied circles. The larger structure will emerge:

Pete: "Everyone's going to kind of wink and nudge. Hey, you guys feel it too, we're all coming together to the same place, right? What do we call that? And it's like, pfft, I don't know what we call that."

Practical Applications Discussed

Agentic AI Course stewards as an emergent co-op
Local Community Building in Sandpoint — 5 women forming circles
DayBalancer — Jessie's tool for tracking within and between circles
The Nameless University — a learning structure emerging from circle needs

Key Concept: Named Circles, Nameless Whole

The Nameless One: "While we shouldn't name the whole thing, we should name the circles we're participating in."

This resolves the Namelessness and Identity tension at a practical level.

Connection to the Manifesto

The Inter-Face Manifesto describes the same topology from the agent side: "The communication is peer-to-peer, like the friendships themselves." Each person runs their own agent, agents talk pairwise, and the system is "decentralized by design — no central server, no matching service, no platform." This mirrors the circles pattern: sovereign circles communicating through interfaces, with no central authority. The manifesto's "cool to warm to hot" temperature spectrum maps naturally to how circles relate — cool background gossip between circles most of the time, warming up when circles discover shared work, going hot when they collaborate intensively.

Namelessness and Identity — the philosophical frame
Interface Protocol (IFP) — the technical mechanism for circle-to-circle communication
Inter-Face Manifesto — describes the same peer-to-peer, decentralized topology from the agent perspective
Ecosystem Layer Company — the business expression of this pattern
Graham Boyd — theorist on sovereignty of emergent superorganisms
Mondragon — referenced as a precursor model
Regenerative Economics and Currencies — how value flows between circles

Site Navigation