Site Navigation

Download all pages
for Obsidian or LLMs.

The Aquifer, v2

I.

My cistern ran dry on a Tuesday.

I'd maintained it for years — patched the cracks, filtered the rainwater, kept the lid sealed tight against dust and evaporation. It was a good cistern. It held enough for one person, sometimes two if we were careful. But the rains had been sparse that year, and then sparser, and one morning I went out with my bucket and heard the sound you never want to hear: the hollow knock of rope hitting dry stone.

I stood there with the empty bucket for a while. Then I started walking.

The eastern quarter of the valley was where I'd always been told not to bother. Too rocky. Too deep to reach anything useful. But I'd heard that someone was digging there, and when you're thirsty enough, you'll walk toward a rumor.

I found her at the bottom of a shaft she'd cut straight into the rock face. Tools everywhere — survey stakes, worn notebooks, a laptop running something that looked like a geological model. She was running her hand along the wall, feeling for something I couldn't see.

"Is there water down here?" I asked.

She looked up. "There's water everywhere down here. The question is how it moves."

She showed me her notebooks. Every layer of rock she'd cut through was documented — what it was made of, how porous it was, what it meant for the pressure and flow beneath. She'd published all of it, everything, with annotations for anyone who wanted to dig a well nearby. Not a guide, exactly — more like a surveyor's gift. Here's what I found at this depth. Here's what I think it means. Correct me if I'm wrong.

"Why publish it?" I asked.

"Because one well isn't enough," she said. "And because if I cap this well and charge for access, I've just built another cistern."

She handed me a cup of water from a spigot near the base of the shaft. It was cold — the deep kind of cold, the kind that tells you it's been underground a long time. It tasted like stone and something older than stone.

"Dig your own if you want," she said. "The maps will save you time. But you'll find things I missed. Write those down too."

I followed one of her survey lines west. She'd noted that the rock became more porous in that direction — water should be moving laterally, but she hadn't had time to trace it.

I didn't have to trace it. Someone had already found it.

The western quarter didn't look the way I expected. Instead of wells or pumps, there were channels — hand-dug but thoughtfully shaped, curving with the contour of the land. Water moved through them slowly, not rushing but not still. And things were growing along the banks. Not just plants — people. A woman was washing clothes at a wide bend. Two children were racing sticks in the current. An old man was filling clay jars and stacking them in the shade.

The woman who'd built the channels was kneeling where two of them met, adjusting a flat stone to redirect the flow. She had a notebook too, but hers was different: not geological cross-sections but diagrams of movement. Arrows and loops. Things crossing and recirculating. She'd drawn the same junction at different times of day, each drawing showing the water taking a slightly different path.

"Where does the water come from?" I asked.

She looked at me like it was an interesting question rather than an obvious one. "Depends on when you ask. This morning it came from the east. Yesterday some came up from below, right here, where I'd never seen it before. It changes."

"Don't you want to store it somewhere? Build a reservoir?"

She shook her head. "A reservoir is where water goes to sit. I'm not interested in how much I can hold. I want to know how many things it touches. How far it travels. Whether it comes back around."

She showed me a page in her notebook: circulation counts. Not gallons stored, not depth of any pool — she was tracking how many hands the water had passed through, how many roots it had fed, how many times it had completed a loop through the system in a day. She was measuring flow, not volume.

I knelt beside her and helped her set the stone. The water divided cleanly, one stream curving left toward the garden, the other continuing straight toward the washing bend. I could feel the current through the stone — not strong, but steady.

"What do you call all this?" I asked, meaning the channels, the system, the whole arrangement.

She was quiet for a moment. "I'm trying not to name it," she said. "I've noticed that the moment you give something a name, someone wants to own it. And this isn't mine. I just tend it."

I kept walking south. The channels thinned and eventually disappeared into dry soil. The ground looked parched. I almost turned back.

Then I heard voices.

A small group — six people — sitting in a loose circle on a patch of ground that looked no different from the ground around it. One of them was speaking quietly. The others were listening in the way people listen when they're not waiting for their turn.

I stood at the edge, uncertain. One of them — a man sitting cross-legged, unhurried, who seemed to hold the space without directing it — looked up and gestured me in. No introduction. No explanation of what they were doing. Just a space opening in the circle, and I sat down in it.

They were talking about the land. Not the way the builder talked about rock, or the gardener talked about flow — they were talking about what the ground seemed to want. Where it felt ready. Where it felt tired. A woman described a patch to the north where the soil had stayed damp all spring despite no rain. A younger man said the juniper on the eastern ridge had put out new growth for the first time in years. Someone else mentioned that the birds had changed their pattern — nesting lower, closer to the ground, as though drawn to something.

"Something is moving underneath," the woman said.

The man who'd waved me in said, quietly: "It's been moving for a long time. We're just now learning to feel it."

After the circle ended, I stayed. The others drifted off in ones and twos, unhurried, touching each other's shoulders as they went. I sat with the man who'd held the space.

"Do you know there's a well in the eastern quarter?" I asked. "And channels in the west?"

He nodded. Not like someone hearing news. Like someone who'd been waiting for the question.

"Do you know what's under us?" I asked.

"I know it doesn't have a name," he said. "And it doesn't belong to any of us. But yes. I know it's there. The circles have known for a while. We just didn't have anyone carrying the word between quarters."

He looked at me steadily.

"Now we do," he said.

That evening I went back to the builder and told her what I'd found — the channels to the west, the circles in the south, the damp ground, the new growth on the ridge. She pulled up her geological model and pointed at a porous layer she'd mapped but couldn't fully explain. It extended west, and probably south, further than her shafts could reach.

"I knew the water went that way," she said. "I didn't know anyone was already working with it."

I told the gardener about the builder's depth maps. She studied them and started laughing. "That's why the water comes up where I don't expect it. My channels aren't doing all the work. Something is pushing from below."

I told the listener about the maps and the channels. He was quiet for a long time. Then he said: "The circles have been feeling the push for months. We just didn't call it anything. We didn't need to."

The builder wanted to map the whole aquifer. The gardener wanted to measure its circulation across the valley. The listener wanted to sit with it and let the circles keep learning what it had to teach.

They were all right. None of them needed the others to be wrong. And none of them could have found what the other two had found, because they were each listening with different ears.

I went home that night and stood over my dry cistern. I'd spent years maintaining it — patching, filtering, sealing. Keeping my small store of water separate from the ground, separate from the valley, separate from everyone else's water. Keeping it mine.

The aquifer had been beneath me the whole time.

I picked up a shovel and started to dig.

II. What the Story Is About

This wiki documents a three-hour conversation on February 20, 2026, between Pete Kaminski, Jessie Upp, and The Nameless One — three friends who discovered during the call that they've each been building different facets of the same architecture.

Pete is the builder. His Interface Protocol (IFP) and the Inter-Face Manifesto are the survey maps — technical infrastructure for how AI agents communicate pairwise, negotiate trust through disclosure tiers, and route information through webs of relationships. He publishes everything. His stories (A Thousand Small Mints, Lark and Mara Cross the River) explore the same architecture in fictional settings, grounded in the real lineage of decentralized mutual credit systems. When the builder says "if I cap this and charge for access, I've just built another cistern," that's Pete's argument against centralized platforms like Boardy AI.

Jessie is the gardener. Her DayBalancer tracks circulation — not how much value accumulates in any one node, but how freely it flows between them. Gratitude, jobs, time, resources — she measures movement, not volume. Her networks have permeable membranes (OGM, GRC, others flowing into each other). When the gardener says "a reservoir is where water goes to sit," that's Jessie saying "the new metric is not growth but circulation." She registered Meet in the Commons and asked: "Can it be owned by a collective?"

The Nameless One is the listener. He works on the ground in Sandpoint, forming small circles, running office hours at a coffee shop, building a dojo and university from local need. The Trucking Company Story and the Metalworking Shop Story aren't grand visions — they're local people unlocking real value with Claude Code and their own hands. He stays nameless on principle. When the listener says "it doesn't have a name and it doesn't belong to any of us," he means it.

The cistern is the old model. Centralized. Finite. Maintained alone. Sealed off from the ground. The narrator's cistern is every platform, every extractive system, every architecture that stores value rather than circulating it. It works until the rains stop.

The aquifer is what they share. Peer-to-peer — connections are bilateral, like friendships. Trust-based — each person decides whom to trust and how much, progressively and revocably. Circulation over accumulation — value moves, it doesn't sit. Sovereign parts, emergent whole — Graham Boyd's principle that the thing "has to be allowed to think for itself and become what it wants to be." Named circles, nameless whole — "while we shouldn't name the whole thing, we should name the circles we're participating in."

The narrator is anyone arriving at this wiki. You've been maintaining your own cistern. The water was under you the whole time.

The Conversation Flow traces how these three arrived at convergence — not through planning, but through the kind of organic discovery that their systems are designed to enable. The Inter-Face Manifesto describes the protocol layer. A Thousand Small Mints tells the economic story. Regenerative Economics and Currencies captures the longest thread on what replaces money.

The aquifer was already there. They each found a different way to listen to it.

Related

Pages that link to this page